Useful Tips

How to get criticism of your photos from a professional and not get in the way?


Last year I was puzzled by the question: “Why have I accumulated so few reviews in five years of excellent work?” I conducted an entire investigation and came to interesting conclusions.

Firstly, I found out that according to scientists, people are more likely to write slanderous words when they don’t get what they promised than to express gratitude for a job well done. But in fact, most of us will not even think about writing a positive review when the services provided were performed exactly as promised. What for? After all, we paid the money and got the expected result.

Secondly, despite the fact that in personal messages, customers thanked me for the work done, my request to write a review rarely paid off. No, they didn’t refuse me. On the contrary, customers promised to do everything in the best possible way, but often simply did not find the time for this. And since I didn’t remind about my request more than two or three times (otherwise it would have been like begging), the number of responses over the course of five years remained minimal.

It was impossible to put up with this state of affairs further. And then, quite unexpectedly, fast food came to my aid.

Somehow, after a long walk around the mall, my wife and I decided to drop by the food court. In anticipation of our orders, I looked at cashier's checks, and noticed that both the catering establishments in which we were purchasing asked to visit a certain site and leave feedback on their work on it. Moreover, the first one offered a 10% discount for the subsequent order for the assessment left, and the second one hoped that visitors would do it without a fee. I remember my first thought was that the last guys are very funny, because they want me to spend a lot of time for free ...

And here I realized a couple of seemingly obvious facts. To write a review, the client must be motivated - this time. The motivation should be sufficient to make a person spend a lot of time writing a useful review - these are two. Please note, friends, not laudatory, but objective and useful to others.

After the introduction of the action with the return of part of the order value in the case of writing a review, I solved the motivation issue. The number of ratings of my work has increased. The time has come to deal with the third conclusion of my investigation. It turned out that many simply do not understand what can be written in the review, in addition to "we liked everything."

What can I write in a review about the work of a photographer

I believe that writing a review about the work of a photographer is easy and now I will prove it to you. Imagine the situation: a loved one asked you to recommend a specialist. How would you describe your experience with a photographer?

You can remember everything that just occurred to you and based on this write your own unique review. If you have problems with this, then use the more universal formula that I derived based on my experience and interviewing several dozen people.

All you need to do to evaluate the work of the photographer is to honestly answer three simple questions:

1) How did the photographer help you prepare for the photo shoot?

2) Was it comfortable during the shooting?

3) How fast did you get the photos, and did you like the result?

Now consider each item in more detail. And as examples, I will cite quotes from real reviews of my work.

Question number 1. How did the photographer help you prepare for the photo shoot?

My work begins long before I pick up the camera. I need to tell customers about the importance of timing for a photo shoot, the technical aspects of shooting, and other important things. I help clients with the choice of locations and the preparation of the optimal route. I tell you what should not be done shortly before the photo shoot. To the benefit of the case, I even started a blog in which I share my experience and strongly recommend that everyone read it before filming.

Which of the above is worth mentioning in the recall?

Write about what helped you the most. And if there were moments that, in your opinion, the photographer should pay more attention to, be sure to mention this. In the future, this will help other newlyweds make the right decision when choosing a specialist, and it will help me to become better.

For example: “I want to highlight a few points why I think Vitaly is a cool photographer. Firstly, the organization of the process itself: everything was discussed in advance, a contract was drawn up, important tips were given for preparing for the photo shoot. ”

Suppose these are common words, but on their basis it can already be concluded that I, as a photographer, approach my duties responsibly.

Question number 2. Was it comfortable during the shooting?

One of the important conditions for getting live interesting photos is the comfort of the models. And I mean not only the material component, but also the psychological one. The set should have a relaxed atmosphere. I always try to joke and cheer on my models. If necessary, I help with advice. In general, I am doing everything so that the person participating in the filming is relaxed and behaves as naturally as possible.

When answering the question whether you were comfortable, simply describe your feelings.

For example: “The photoshoot went lightly! A relaxed atmosphere, positive communication, help in staging, a professional approach, and in the end - just awesome pictures ... ".

You can supplement the review with a description of what the photographer himself remembered during the filming:

“Vitaly is very friendly and sociable. All the guests also liked the photographer, Vitaly works unobtrusively and catches the most interesting moments ... "

Question number 3. How fast did you get the photos and did you like the result?

Despite the fact that under the terms of the contract, the processing time for photographs can reach several months, in most cases I transfer finished photographs to the customer much earlier. Therefore, you can mention in a review, for example, that you admired wedding photos after only two weeks. And here's how to describe how much you liked my work, think for yourself. I can only give one piece of advice, it’s better to do it right after viewing the photos. At this point, the emotions are very strong and it will be easier to put them on paper.

For example: “Photos were very pleasant to all our friends, relatives and we. "

And you can: “Vitaly, thank you so much for the wonderful photos of our wedding! It was very pleasant to work with a person who is a true professional in his field ... "

In any case, what to write, how to write and whether to write at all, is up to you. In the meantime, I will give examples of good reviews left by my clients.

Good examples of photographer reviews

The first example is a review of the work of a family photographer.

"We want to thank Vitaly for the professionally done work!

When my husband and I wanted to invite a photographer for our daughter’s 1st birthday, without even thinking, they invited Vitaly. We have known him since the wedding, he was our photographer! And once again they were convinced of the complete dedication to their work! The result of the work and the shooting process itself are important to him.

His work begins even before the event. He asked to photograph the venue of the holiday (we had this apartment) and gave advice on eliminating unnecessary personnel! I learned about the plan of the event and about the possibility of using the flash.

He is always punctual and considerate! Our guests were delighted that he was everywhere, but he did not bother anyone and did not constrain anyone. And it was very important and very difficult to do, the apartment was still small.

The one-year-old birthday girl immediately felt a good person in him and was not afraid!

Photos were ready very quickly, but the result was amazing! I want to print and hang every photo on the wall!

Thanks again! We are always 100% sure of you. "

The second example is a review of the work of a wedding photographer.

“I want to say a huge thank you to our photographer. A true professional in my field) I want to highlight a few points why I think Vitaliy is a cool photographer:

Firstly, the organization of the process itself: everything was discussed in advance, a contract was drawn up, important tips were given for preparing for the photo shoot.

Secondly, the process of the photo shoot: Vitaly arrived earlier than the newlyweds, suggested how to get up and where to get the photos alive and natural) another important note is that real, beautiful emotions, kisses were caught in the frame)

Thirdly, Vitaly himself as a person is just wonderful, very sociable, funny, friendly)

Well, and fourthly, the quality of the photos was very pleasing, beautiful, cute, it is clear that the professional was shooting)

If you evaluate Vitaly’s work in general, I’ll put 10 points out of 10) Thank you for capturing the happiest day of our life so beautifully) "

The third example is a good review of a wedding photo shoot.

"Vitaly. There are not enough words to fully express gratitude for your work at our wedding! You gave us a sea of ​​positive and good mood! Always been at your best!

The photos were organic, magical. Just wonderful! My husband and I are delighted! )))

I don’t know how, but you did it always and everywhere. We even learned about some events only from photographs! ))))

Thank you very much!

I wish you creative success and the prosperity of your studio! "

For more examples, see the "Photographer Reviews" section.

Where can I post a review of my work

When they ask me where it is best to post feedback on our cooperation, first of all I ask you to do this in my VKontakte group.

Thanks to the VK group, you can always make sure that the reviews are written by real customers, and not just ordered on specialized sites for a couple of hundred rubles.

If you have mail on Yandex, then a copy of the review can be left in the Yandex.spravochnik service, as well as in the new Yandex. Services web service. Just follow the link and paste the copied text.

I would be especially grateful if you find a moment and leave a review on one of the wedding portals: Gorko, or another similar one.

Thank you, friends, for your time and see you soon!

article author

How to respond to unfounded criticism? Do you remove negative comments under your work on social networks? What criticism is really useful? How to use criticism to improve your work? We will analyze all these questions in the article, show examples of critical analysis and tell you how to get constructive criticism from the pros for free.

Reviews about your photos can be positive and negative, and criticism itself can be personal and public, long-awaited and unsolicited. Obviously, in each case it is necessary to react to criticism in different ways, but always - adequately.

Unsolicited criticism of photos. What to do?

There is an opinion that any criticism is useful for the development of a creative personality: they say that without adequate criticism stagnation, complacency and degradation will come. So people think, ready to criticize everything in the world, even if no one asked them to. Most often, they do not even understand the issue and could not repeat what they criticize. In fact, the sofa critic never wants good for the one he criticizes. Negative criticism is a verbal attack. Emotional aggression. An attempt to assert oneself at someone else's expense. Many of us live in anxiety and tension. Criticizing other people's photos is a safe way to throw out accumulated negativity, motivating this with the benefit for the development of the photographer.

You can criticize only in one case: if a person asked you to. This should be done as objectively as possible, very delicately and without going over to the individual. But this is not clear to many. Therefore, the photographer needs to learn to CRITICALLY criticize those people whose opinion is not authoritative for the photographer. And if you think some unsolicited statements about your work are inappropriate, you can say so to their author or completely delete negative comments under your work.

At the same time, it is useful for each author to find out an objective opinion about his work and look for it from those photographers whose work you really like.

Public criticism of photos. How to prepare?

Even sharp criticism expressed personally is not perceived as painful as criticism expressed by third parties or published on the Internet. If you are just starting to take pictures, it makes sense to first get an opinion about your work from those acquaintances whose taste you trust. Do not immediately after buying a camera to publish your first frame and ask critics from all your subscribers in social networks: you risk running into ridicule and throw the camera to hell.

However, in the work of every photographer, a moment comes when he gets tired of cooking in his own world and is ready to show his work to the photo community. This can be the publication of photos in a photo chat or on a thematic forum, compiling a portfolio on your website or on a page on social networks, demonstrating your work on photo courses, participating in photo contests or photo exhibitions.

Publication of works where many people can see them implies the possibility of receiving public criticism. It’s one thing if it’s just likes and approving comments, another thing is pointing out mistakes and lack of taste, condemning or even insulting the author. You need to understand that photography is not a dollar for everyone to like, and immediately prepare for both positive and negative reviews.

A constructive perception of criticism is to learn how to benefit from it.

Positive feedback. What are their benefits?

Some believe that it is impossible to extract any benefit from a positive review: they say that praise has a social connotation - this is a desire to make the author pleasant, flatter. Praise causes the production of dopamine, a hormone of pleasure that encourages the photographer to move on in the pursuit of positive reviews.

However, commendable reviews increase self-esteem, allow you to raise the price tag for the services of a photographer. In addition, if you look at the latest trends in pedagogy, you need to scold less and give more praise, and then thanks to their support they show good success in development. The same is with creative people: approval inspires further experiments, and condemnation, on the contrary, discourages creativity.

However, positive reviews do not carry information for analysis and self-improvement. It is impossible to extract constructive praise, since there is no indication of errors and ways to correct them.

Negative reviews. How to respond?

Negative reviews can not only ruin your mood, but also hurt your self-esteem. However, learn to adequately respond to criticism, extracting from it the maximum benefit for yourself.

  • Thank you restrainedly or jokingly for your opinion (Thank you, I’ll take note. To blame - I’ll fix it!).
  • Do not make excuses and don’t get personal: an inadequate reaction to criticism will hit your image much more painfully than someone’s negative review of your work.
  • Ignore unconstructive criticism, including deleting comments and banning unwanted commentators.
  • Do not take negative reviews to heart, but try to extract information from them to rethink your creativity.

Constructive criticism. How to digest it?

Constructive criticism - this is such criticism, after which it becomes clear how to correct the error and how to prevent its repetition in the future. This conversation is not about how bad everything is, but about what can be done better.

BUT destructive criticism - These are statements aimed at insulting a person, scornful judgments about the work done, ridiculing the author and all his works in general.

Look for constructive criticism from professionals recognized by experts in your field. Even if a professional photographer smashes all your photos to smithereens, you should not despair or look for excuses. You need to understand what has been said and take note of it.

  • Pay attention to repetitions. If you have many reviews, and some comments are repeated several times, it is worth paying attention to this. Most likely, there is a flaw and will be noticed by viewers and customers.
  • Take a detached look at your work. If you can’t break the emotional connection with the photo right now, it’s better to keep a critical review in your memory and return to it later. And there it is already decided: whether the indicated defects really have a place to be, or everything said by the critic is nothing but nit-picking or even envy.
  • Consider the comments below. If you doubt whether criticisms are legitimate, try to correct the error and evaluate the result. Most of the comments are really worth considering in the future.
  • Understand that you always have room to grow. Regardless of how much experience and professional awards the author has accumulated, he is vulnerable. Even if the author is the first photographer in the world, there is always the opportunity for self-improvement. Everyone should strive to become better.

Critical reviews, good or bad, usually act directly on the personality, affecting the human ego. To benefit from them, you need to try to concentrate on obtaining real knowledge and benefits. Стоит поощрять людей честно выражать свое мнение, применять разные подходы, «выжимая» из критиков ценные крупицы информации. There is no limit to perfection. Всегда есть возможности для самосовершенствования, и их необходимо реализовывать.

Критика эксперта. За что сказать спасибо?

  • An expert spends his personal time viewing and analyzing your work, which testifies to the expert’s respect for your work and for you as an author. It costs a lot.
  • With his criticism, the pro gives you advice on improving your work, shares his professional experience absolutely free - consider this free training.
  • A professional draws your attention to those mistakes and shortcomings that, perhaps, you yourself would never have noticed in your work. Sometimes a photographer understands that something is not right in the frame, but he cannot understand what exactly. In this case, the criticism is more than useful.
  • The expert opinion, even if negative, voiced publicly, draws public attention to the object of criticism. And if your work is worthy of the expert’s attention, it means that they really have something, for example, potential.
  • A positive review by an expert about your work can help you fly high, which can positively affect the number of orders, the average bill and your status.

How to get parsing your photos for free?

Step 1. Upload any number of your works to the Vkontakte photo album or send it to [email protected]

Step 2. Check that all your photos are from different series. To sort 10 frames from one series is rather boring.

Step 3. Subscribe to our channel on YouTube and stay tuned for new issues of the “Photo on Criticism” column every Wednesday.

Step 4. Leave feedback on the analysis of your work. It is very important for us to know whether the criticism was constructive and whether it helped you look differently at your work. It is from your feedback that we will judge whether to continue in the same vein.

As a beginner and as a pro: why should a photographer compare his photos before and after training

Photographer Philippe Homelesser has been involved in photography for almost three years and has been blogging in which he often publishes his photos in the Before and After, Then and Now genres, showing how self-training, practice and experience can improve the quality of pictures.

Category: Inspiration 07/10/2018

Analysis of 120 photos from a professional photographer and photo school teacher: part 1.

You can learn photography yourself. But criticism and advice from the pros can help you quickly find your mistakes and prevent them from happening again. About how our teachers support students, not only in the classroom, but also online, see our material.

Category: Training 07/31/2018

How to set up color rendering in Lightroom and Photoshop for publishing on the Internet?

Why when saving a photo in Photoshop changes the color of the photo? How to save a photo for printing or publication, so that the colors remain the same as in Photoshop? We will answer these questions in the article.

Category: Instruction 09/05/2018

How is the lesson on the legal side of the photographer’s commercial activity: photo report

In the course of commercial photography, we analyze legal issues regarding contracts, taxes, registration, legal activities and resolving conflicts with customers in court.

heading: Photo report 09/03/2018

How to adjust the white balance in the camera and in Photoshop?

Sometimes you shoot, you shoot, you twist, you twist the camera settings, and the colors in the photo still turn out unnatural. Now the snow is too blue, then the skin is too yellow. What's the matter?

Category: Instruction Training 09/14/2018

The most successful shot from the teachers of the BLENDA photo school

We asked our teachers what shot from their portfolio they consider the most successful. And they got very interesting and unusual stories of creating wonderful photos.

Category: Inspiration 10/18/2018

How to start photographing weddings?

Many of our graduates, talented and promising photographers, would like to shoot weddings, but they doubt themselves. How to overcome all fears and start photographing weddings, we learned from the successful wedding photographer Ivan Maligon.

Category: Interview 10/28/2018

I take pictures and teach photography in Izhevsk

Name: Email: Website: Review Title: Rating: Check this box to confirm you are human.

Feedback from VKontakte is a great photographer and all that

If I had the opportunity to put 10 stars, I would have done it without hesitation!
I have no words!
So nice person and wonderful work! For the first time I found a photographer with such a set! Natalya, thank you so much, you are just amazing! I fell in love with your work!
I do not stop smiling, looking at the photos that I received from Natalia!

good day! I wanted to tell you again THANKS BIG! our parents are delighted with the photos) my mother says now I don’t even want to watch ordinary photos) the printed ones have already been taken apart! thank! you are a master!)

The review with the photo was moved to the page

Natasha, thanks for the wonderful pictures of our family. Thank you for your patience and help during the photo shoot. I was very worried about how Igor would behave, because he is still very small))) And although it was not easy, the photos turned out to be wonderful.

Thank you, Natalya, not only we liked the photos, a good impression was left of the shooting and communication with you. There is a desire to meet again. I think that in a few years, our future daughter will be happy to see these photos. Thank. hands: hands: hands

Natalya, from the bottom of our hearts we want to thank you for a wonderful photo shoot! My husband and I were delighted with your photos! I was very worried that being in a position would be difficult and shy to be photographed, but thanks to your help, everything went very easily and naturally! Thank you, thanks to your work, wonderful photos of this important event will remain in our family 🙂 Thank you very much! 🙂 🙂 🙂

Natalya, I liked the photos very much. Thank you very much) I think I’ll somehow repeat the photo shoot)

Natasha, thank you for the wonderful photos of my pregnancy. ^ _ ^ The photo session was very easy and interesting! I wasn’t even tired) Thank you for helping to feel relaxed and at ease during the shooting, supporting our cheerful mood! :) I really, really liked working with you. All photos are bright, clear, and especially liked portrait photos! I really hope that soon we will meet again! I wish you creative success, spiritual harmony and inexhaustible energy. ,)

Good day. I was waiting for my photo shoot. I really enjoyed the shooting process! Despite the autumn cold and wind (+6 degrees) everything went easy and fun. To everyone who has not yet decided on a photo shoot in the cold - do not hesitate, I really, really recommend it)))). Communicating with Natasha is a real pleasure smile It immediately becomes clear that she is a passionate person who sincerely surrenders to her beloved business. And besides, she has an excellent sense of humor, so it’s easy to find a common language with her. Improvisation and a willingness to create together - it captivates in it. Photos are incredibly original, thoughtful and complete. It remains only to wait impatiently until Natasha’s masterpieces are in your hands smile If you are ready to give all the best along with the photographer, then you should smile

Natasha, thank you very much for your work. everyone really enjoyed it. Especially Makarik)))) Until we meet again.

Natasha! Thank you so much for the wonderful fairy-tale photos! It’s a pleasure to work with you! I got a lot of emotions from the photo shoot! Good luck with your work! You are a master of your craft! And a very positive person. I really hope that we will meet again. Many thanks for your work.

A photoshoot with Natalia is lightness, relaxedness, unobtrusiveness and positive.

We were looking for not just a photographer and not just a professional, there are a lot of such people in the bottomless ocean of the Internet.
First of all, we wanted a person to be close to us in spirit, easy to communicate, positive, vibrant and individual. still shooting with a baby is not easy. Excitement ran ahead of us. We threw her so many questions, it seemed even stupid, but she answered everything, instilled in us confidence that everything would work out.

So, on August 28, 2012, d. Ludorvay, our family and. Natasha! As a mother, I was very worried about how my child would survive these 1.5 hours. But we did not even notice how they flew. Moreover, I did not even notice when she managed to get out a camera and shoot so many frames. She is a professional! She attracted the attention of the baby with gentle conversations, and toys, and even danced in front of him. Everything is for us! Super! I did not miss a single moment to press the treasured button.
We had a great time! This is not a photo shoot, this is a vacation.

The result - 130 photos in excellent quality - the work of a professional, done perfectly!

Hello everyone, who is looking for a photographer, and surely went into the “reviews” column to find out more about the photographer Natalya.))) I used to come here to find out about her. Having studied Portfolio and reviews, I realized that it suits us. But in life, Natasha was even better than you imagine. Kind, positive and without kompleksa. All the time I was reassured, she said: "- we don’t get so crazy all over, and so on! I started to make faces and make faces, scolded me kindly))) so everyone who is looking for a good, positive, romantic, without complexes, and an eternal well-fed photographer, Natalya will suit you perfectly!. Personally from me and Roma, thank you very much! and to all our guests, you really liked it!

The review with the photo was moved to the page

Good morning everyone! I want to tell you about my little adventure. On July 22, one event took place, which was very important for me - a photo shoot. For two weeks I was actively preparing for it. Thanks to Natalia, I plunged into a fairy tale. We were very lucky with the weather: warm, sunny, calm. It coincided that at the very end of our photo session a beautiful sunset appeared, which undoubtedly was a plus for us. The photos turned out great and Natalya’s work is simply amazing. Natalya is a master of her craft. Thank you very much for such wonderful photos, for a wonderful day, for a good mood, for a cozy atmosphere. I really hope that we will work again. Thanks a lot again.

Natasha, from our entire family - many thanks for the photo shoot at our son’s baptism. All the good that was written in previous reviews is true. And that it’s easy to work with you, although we met only on the set, and that an approach was immediately found to the child, and that the photos turned out to be stunning, exceeded all expectations! I liked everything very, very, very much, we will definitely contact you again! THANK YOU VERY MUCH!

I had a photoshoot for the first time, so the moment was important that the photo gallery helped a lot with poses, facial expressions - because without a mirror it is difficult to judge how well I will look in the photo. Natalya is a good photographer, it was enough to see the final result - I was delighted! Given the complexity of the situation when I had to take pictures (June 19th, the “World Flood” and not the weather - reflected on the whole preparation), Natalya was able to help me - she is an “easy” person, it was simple and comfortable with her, although until that moment we hadn’t were familiar. In addition to professional experience, I think it is not unimportant how easy it is to work with a person! Natalya, thanks for the great photos. I look forward to the next meeting!

We are very grateful for those wonderful photos that you managed to take for us! I would like to note that the ability to quickly adapt to new, unknown and not quite standard environments is a distinctive feature of only professionals. Another important factor is the ability to accurately understand the client’s desire - it would seem, why would a young couple go to an abandoned factory to do a photo shoot ?! What an absurdity, people have adopted the standard route - eternal flame, bridges, moose and the rest of the nonsense. In such a situation, an ordinary amateur photographer or a beginner will most likely be confused by the lack of experience in such filming, and understanding what is needed to make a festive background from abandoned buildings, and young people have the feeling of a real wedding. To all of the above, we would like to emphasize a sincere respect for your professionalism, individual creative approach, and cordial attitude towards customers - be it to your old friends. We are confident that this is not the only meeting with you; we will entrust only you with the opportunity to experiment. Thank you, best wishes for your creativity. Marina and Andrew.


Reader, if you yourself found this text, looking through a collection of articles on photography, you can, with a clear conscience, close it without reading. Everything that is written here is for you, most likely, elementary truths. But if you were strongly advised to read this article, and even sent a link - it means, probably, some things obvious to all are unknown to you. If so, then it makes sense to read to the end.

Just a few years ago, at the turn of the century, it became clear that for the first time in the history of mankind, the World Wide Web could give every viewer the opportunity to see photographs he was interested in, and every amateur photographer the opportunity to find his own viewer and critic who was able to give an objective assessment of the photograph. And then open virtual communities of amateur photographers, or photo sites, arose.

Initially, criticism was considered one of the most important components of virtual photo communication. She not only helped (in any case, in theory) to learn from mistakes, but (again, in theory) contributed to the formation of estimates. Ratings were composed of ratings, ratings determined the audience of the photographer, and the audience created idols.

But with the avalanche-like growth of the Internet photo audience and the change in its composition, the attitude towards criticism has also changed. It turned out that ratings can be formed without critical reviews, that is, by simply counting the votes “for”, and the educational role of criticism has come to naught due to complete uselessness.

Against this background, the opposite process remained almost unnoticed: some members of the global photo-site community (making up a negligible part of it) seriously became interested in the history and theory of photography and fine art in general, and together with understanding of photography gained the ability to more or less qualified meaningful criticism. Unfortunately, at the same time, they almost lost the gift of clearly expressing their thoughts, that is, dispensing with the use of indigestible terms. but this is still half the trouble.

A new small but cocky layer of critics immediately began to shock the respectable photo-site majority with a complete lack of reverence for beautiful waterfalls, pink sunsets, golden domes, happy newlyweds and unfortunate kittens. The online photo community has been divided into two disparate parts, most reminiscent of a gadfly and a cow in terms of mass ratio and relation to each other.

There is nothing surprising in the fact that among the photo-site majority there is a common opinion on critics:

"Critics are losers who have not achieved anything in life, and therefore act out in other people's photos - that is, creatures are not just useless, but undoubtedly harmful."

Those commentators who decide to swim through the honey rivers in order to point out the shortcomings of other people's masterpieces usually receive a standard stamped response from the authors: "before criticizing, show me your photos, and if you don’t have them, be silent and don’t go" . Or: “Before clever, sort out your album” (quote).

It goes without saying that such statements are in violation of elementary ethics: when discussing a specific work, it is necessary to discuss it. And translating the discussion into personalities is the last thing. And besides, they testify to the regrettable flaws in the upbringing and education of these authors. The fact is that:

  1. To understand photography, you do not need to be a photographer, just as you do not have to be a winemaker to understand wines. The wine is not understood by winemakers, but by gourmets and tasters. Or, as they say in the east - in order to assert that the baboon has a red ass, you do not need to show your own.
  2. The level of understanding of a good critic is usually high enough not to overestimate their photographs, and therefore not to seek to show them. Which, incidentally, does not mean at all that a critic not known to anyone in one photo community cannot be a photographer who has long been recognized in another, often to a much more professional circle.
  3. If the critic is at the same time a high-level photographer, then he usually does not post his photographs on photo sites. The fact is that a normal photo-site viewer, accustomed to beautiful sunsets and busty girls in coarse-mesh stockings hugging with chrome bikes, is usually able to perceive pictures only of their own, close to their level, style and ideological richness. And being completely unprepared for the perception of art photography, such a viewer will inevitably consider it at best a technical marriage, and at worst a mockery of himself. And this is natural: art photography is an art, and its understanding, as a rule, does not come by itself, it requires conscious efforts to form a perception (see the article "Discovery of the Plane").

Конечно, в общем и целом для любых открытых фотосообществ характерно вялое пассивное неприятие любой критики - поскольку подавляющее большинство их членов не ставят своей целью учиться чему бы то ни было. Обычно задача их проще - найти кружок единомышленников, любящих снимать то же, что и они, и занять в нем место. Иногда таких авторов называют "Щелкунчиками", в противовес "продвинутым", то есть осознанно снимающим фотографам. For the sake of political correctness, we will call them entry-level photographers, although this definition is inaccurate - for most of them, the entry-level becomes simultaneously final, simply because they do not want to move anywhere.

But the variations in attitude to criticism are as diverse as the types of the human psyche, and by this criterion photographers can be divided into a huge number of categories. Let's try to highlight the main ones:

Entry-level photographers:

  • A housewife. The name is conditional - this type may include tourists, travelers, and loving parents. The most common and inert type. Any criticism very much upsets the Housewife, since her (his) photographs always show people, animals, cities, landscapes, tourist routes that are dear to her. Most often, she (he) does not understand at all why she is scolded - she just shows in the pictures what she likes. She does not take any serious actions in response to criticism, but she never draws any conclusions for herself.
  • Skunk. Actually the photo does not interest him. He is ambitious, and he uses the circle of like-minded people as the first step to conquer the very peaks of the entire virtual photo community. He usually perceives criticism as an attempt on the sacred, and the actions he takes in response can only be compared with a sewerage breakthrough on a busy street on a hot day. Most of all, Skunk is depressed and outraged by the situation when the critic does not have his own works that can be "criticized" in response. In general, he should have known that in the most respected photo clubs, reciprocal commenting and evaluation of the work of critics entails an immediate indefinite ban, that is, the termination of membership in the club. And it is right. The option is “Bull”, which, having seen a professional, and therefore incomprehensible criticism of its work, falls into uncontrollable rage, reflexively attacks the critic, butts him for a long time and tramples his hooves, running away for better dispersal and attacking again and again. It differs from a calculating Skunk in that it is blind butting, and therefore usually looks rather funny.
  • Bath sheet. He suffers from a lack of communication, because he rarely receives feedback on his work. It sticks to every critic, taking his soul out of him with questions, how would he take this shot, demands to show his own version of the picture of the same plot, disputes about the essence of criticism, genres of photography and human decency, as well as regrets about where the world is heading. At the earliest opportunity, he takes the conversation away from the photograph, in order to say later: there is no criticism, sheer flood.
  • Fairy Girl. Having seen criticism of his work, he goes to watch the work of the critic, and writes an admiring review under each. Repeats this operation until the critic retreats, disgraced. The type of behavior is characteristic of models.
  • Diligent Donkey. Honestly trying to delve into criticisms. Realizing that he will never succeed, he either throws a photograph or becomes a Bull.
  • Lover. An author who is not included in any of the listed categories. An unreliable option. Some Amateurs, comparing their work with the work of masters, come to the thought of the need to study, begin to listen to criticism, and leave the ranks of thoughtless button clicks. It is from them that good photographers are obtained

  • Technophile. To all but his fellow technophiles, he is neglected. He perceives and awaits criticism only of the technical side of his work, and considers all references to compositional and plot construction to be empty unnecessary rants. A common result of Technofil’s work is a “about nothing” photograph in a beautiful package.
  • Sponge. Recognizes the undoubted usefulness of criticism, and expects critics to teach her (him) free and voluntary everything that should be known. Despite the fact that the Internet is full of not only articles, but also thematic collections of articles, and entire libraries devoted to photography (for example, the library of the Virtual Photojournal XE), and the search for educational materials and generally useful information has never been so easy as it is now, - he opens his beak, like a cuckoo in a stranger’s nest, and with a loud tweet calls all those flying to fill his bottomless throat.
  • Cool Pro. He considers himself a professional with a completed education and experience, knowingly allowing him to ignore any criticism from above. Here is the trait that distinguishes him from a true Professional: Cool Prof doesn’t want to learn anything else. There are two subspecies of KP:

1) Graduate. I am sure that everything that is needed was taught at the institute (or, more often, at the school). In response to criticism, she demands to present a diploma of the same vocational school that he graduated from.
2) The businessman. I’ve never studied anything, but on calendars and glossy magazines I’ve got a lot of money. Refuses to speak with the critic until he proves that his fees are not lower than that of the Merchant himself.

From the point of view of artistic development, both of them are something hopelessly spoiled: a diplomat does all his life what he has been taught, Kommersant is what he is paid for. In general, Cool Profi is the worst of all possible types, a place for him is in a photo studio.

  • True connoisseur. It is distinguished by a deep understanding of photography (in any case, he believes so). He is exclusively interested in non-mass, intellectual art. He criticizes his works kindly, ignores incompetent critics, corrects competent ones, pointing to the compositional and semantic layers of photography that they have not noticed - in general, behaves like a good teacher among first-graders. It is pointless to criticize the True Judge, since the depth of his understanding cannot be surpassed by definition.
  • Real Artist. As it should be a genius, all the time is somewhere "outside." They don’t think about the meaning of the criticism they write to him - because he thinks all the same in a perpendicular plane. But the very rows of black letters on a white background amuse him, and even delight him. And sometimes they are upset and angry - this does not depend on what is written by these letters, but solely on the mood of the Artist himself.
  • Adequate Photographer. He readily accepts criticisms, draws conclusions from them, and steadily works on himself in order to eliminate errors and gaps in education. It differs fundamentally from all other types in that it belongs to the category of mythical characters and in reality does not occur.
  • A small digression: the author of this article does not in any way rank himself either as a critic or as an "advanced" photographer. He is flattered by the hope that now he can be attributed to the Lovers (or at least to the Diligent Donkeys), although only a couple of years ago, with his habit of thoughtlessly clicking all at least some beautiful views, he pulled at best a Housewife. Thanks to the critics for the first kicks!

    In general, if this classification seems offensive to someone, remember that the choice of the category you fall into depends on you.

    But back to criticism and critics. Of course, everything that was said about critics here did not mean just any person who decided to express an opinion on his neighbor's photograph in the most unpleasant form.

    A critic is not just a state of mind, it is also a qualification.

    In order to become a critic it is not enough to be able to be rude to colleagues and sincerely, with all my heart, to praise the powers that be. At a minimum, a beginner critic needs objectivity, correctness, knowledge of the basic laws of layout and requirements for the technical side of photography, as well as the realization that all this is completely insufficient.

    A true critic can not do without a serious education and understanding of the subject - that is, the Art of Photography, its laws and history. A distinguishing feature of a qualified critic is the ability, in addition to a general assessment of the work, to give its detailed compositional and technical analysis, arguing (if necessary) for each expressed position with examples from the history of fine art in general, and photography in particular.

    Therefore, a recommendation to novice authors: if you want to understand whether it is worth taking a specific critic seriously, do not ask him if he can take a better picture than you, which means his strange nickname, why he does not have any of his photographs, and why after two years on the site he still walks in the status of "applicant".

    Instead, ask him to give a compositional analysis of your work, and you will immediately understand everything. Provided, of course, that you understand what you wrote.

    And if a competent critic, who has written many reviews of other works, refuses to give an analysis of your photo, or even speaks of it in a monosyllabic and not very flattering way - do not rush to blame him for incompetence. It is possible that he is simply not interested in talking about your work. Take it as an independent assessment of your creativity.

    And vice versa. If a good critic smashed your work to smithereens, do not rush to be offended. A good critic rarely scolds the work of authors whom he considers hopeless.

    2007 © Anton Vershovskiy
    The author is grateful to Olga (Psycheja) for criticism and help in working on the text, as well as for adding to the classification.